Supernova remnant RCW86 – Dating modified to AD 185

According to a recent study, the supernova remnant RCW 86 is much younger than previously thought, pointing towards a modified date of about AD 185. The formation of the remnant appears to coincide with a supernova observed by Chinese astronomers in AD 185. The study used data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray observatory and the European space agency’s XMM-Newton observatory. Previous suggestions to this effect have been confirmed by the new X-ray data, the lead author reported.

When a massive star runs out of fuel, it collapses on itself, creating a supernova that can outshine an entire galaxy. The intense explosion hurls the outer layers of the star into space and produces powerful shock waves. The remains of the star and the material it encounters are heated to millions of degrees and can emit intense X-ray radiation for thousands of years.

In the stellar work, the debris in RCW 86 was studied to estimate when its progenitor star originally exploded. It was also calculated how quickly the shocked or energized shell is moving in RCW 86, by studying one part of the remnant. Combining this expansion velocity with the size of the remnant and a basic understanding of how supernovas expand, led to the estimation of the age of RCW 86 afresh – as about 2000 years old.

The younger age for RCW 86 may explain an astronomical event observed almost 2000 years ago. In AD 185, Chinese astronomers (and possibly the Romans) recorded the appearance of a new bright star. The Chinese noted that it sparkled like a star and did not appear to move in the sky, arguing against it being a comet. Also, the observers noticed that the star took about eight months to fade, consistent with the modern observations of supernovas. However, uncertainties about the age provided significant doubt about the association.

The smaller age estimate for the remnant follows directly from a higher expansion velocity. By examining the energy distribution of the X-rays, a technique known as spectroscopy, the team found that most of the X-ray emission was caused by high energy electrons moving through a magnetic field. This is well known process that gives rise to low energy radio emission. However, only very high shock velocities can accelerate the electrons to such high energies that X-ray radiation is emitted. The difference in age estimates for RCW 86 is due to differences in expansion velocities measured for the supernova remnant. The authors speculate that these variations arise because RCW 86 is expanding into an irregular bubble blown by a wind from the progenitor star before it exploded. In some directions, the shock wave has encountered a dense region outside the bubble and slowed down, whereas in other regions the shock remains inside the bubble and is still moving rapidly. These regions give the most accurate estimate of the age.

srini